Segment
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Premium2. Tristar Snowpower HP Lowcost
Comparison: Tristar Snowpower HP vs. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Tristar (0%). The first tyre test of Tristar Snowpower HP was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowpower HP and the UltraGrip 9+ were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Tristar Snowpower HP
| GoodYear UltraGrip 9+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip 9+ Satisfactory
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Tristar Snowpower HP | 43,2 | ||||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ | 35,2 | 27,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,1 | 2,5 | 1,0 | 1,8 |
| Tristar Snowpower HP Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 2,2 | 4,3 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 3,0 | 1,8 | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 1,9 |
| Show test details | |||||||
