Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Tristar Ice-Plus S210 Lowcost
Comparison: Tristar Ice-Plus S210 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Tristar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Tristar (0%). But when it comes to comparing Tristar Ice-Plus S210 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Tristar Ice-Plus S210 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Ice-Plus S210 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested.
| # | Tristar Ice-Plus S210
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Tristar Ice-Plus S210 | 47,3 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
