Segment
2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium3. Toyo Snowprox S954 Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Snowprox S954 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Exemplary2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good3. Toyo Snowprox S954 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Toyo Snowprox S954 Conditionally recommended3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Toyo Snowprox S954 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 Rating: Test winner | 2+ | 2 | 1 | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Toyo Snowprox S954 | 37 | 26,9 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 W330 | 32,3 | 25 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
