Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium4. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle5. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Avon ZV7
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
5. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
5. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
4. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 10.295. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary5. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended5. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 | 34.6 | 29.5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: - | 228 | 104 | 124 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
