Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle3. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Nexen N fera Sport
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 10.29
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary
Worst rating in test
3. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 | 34.6 | 29.5 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 279 | 141 | 139 | ||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: - | 228 | 104 | 124 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: - | 230 | 115 | 115 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,5 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Good | 2,5 | 2,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
