• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes Comfort vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View

Let's delve into a close comparison between two summer touring tyres: Toyo Proxes Comfort and Kumho Ecsta HS52. Whereas these tyres are manufactured by Toyo and Kumho respectively, both of them are lauded for their performance on dry and wet surfaces, albeit with a few differences.


The Toyo Proxes Comfort, manufactured in Japan, is a quality tyre offering excellent dry handling and braking performance as noted in its best features from the Autobild test. This is further acknowledged in the autobild 2024 summary where it was applauded for its dynamic handling both on wet and dry surfaces, as well as its low rolling noise. However, the tyre fell short in the area of lifespan.


Contrarily, the Kumho Ecsta HS52, a successor of the Kumho Ecsta HS51, outperforms in multiple aspects. It ranks high in the Autobild test, securing the third position out of 51 tyres, demonstrating great prowess in dry and wet braking, handling, and offering great value for its price. The ADAC test also solidified its place as a top contender, placing it in the eighth position. It was particularly praised for its impressive performance on both wet and dry surfaces, as well as its affordable price tag. Nevertheless, the tyre suffered from mediocre comfort in rolling and a delayed steering response.


The verdict: Both tyres display strengths and weaknesses, but the Kumho Ecsta HS52 edges out, according to our rating system, with 78% compared to the Toyo Proxes Comfort at 66%. This reflects a more balanced performance in terms of handling and braking on different surfaces—dry or wet—combined with more value for its price. Therefore, if you're targeting a tyre with a solid track-record of satisfaction in various aspects, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 should be high on your list. However, if noise reduction and braking on dry surfaces are your principal concerns, then the Toyo Proxes Comfort would be a plausible alternative.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Toyo Proxes Comfort
70%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Toyo Proxes Comfort
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Wet Handling
Toyo Proxes Comfort
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Wet Circle Cornering
Toyo Proxes Comfort
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Toyo Proxes Comfort
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Toyo Proxes Comfort
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Best: Debica Presto UHP2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Toyo Proxes Comfort
87%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Toyo Proxes Comfort
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Toyo Proxes Comfort
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (87.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Toyo Proxes Comfort
75%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Toyo Proxes Comfort
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Ride Comfort
Toyo Proxes Comfort
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Economy
Toyo Proxes Comfort
62%
Toyo
Proxes Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Toyo Proxes Comfort
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes Comfort
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (96.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison