Segment
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Toyo Proxes CF2 and Vredestein Sportrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Toyo Proxes CF2 was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Vredestein Sportrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Proxes CF2 and the Sportrac 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2
| Vredestein Sportrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Sportrac 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 1,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Vredestein Sportrac 5 | 36,8 | 37 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||