Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost3. Riken Road Performance Lowcost4. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Riken Road Performance vs. Avon ZV7
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2
| Nexen N blue HD Plus
| Riken Road Performance
| Avon ZV7
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R18 | R13 - R22 | R15 - R16 | R13 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
2. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
3. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.53. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory2. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory3. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory2. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
4. Avon ZV7 60%
Wet handling
1. Avon ZV7 85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Avon ZV7 79%
Wet braking
2. Avon ZV7 74%
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Avon ZV7 82%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
3. Avon ZV7 55%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 | 37,8 | 40,5 | |||||
| Nexen N blue HD plus | 38,3 | 40,6 | |||||
| Avon ZV7 | 38,3 | 38,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
