Segment
1. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Premium3. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle4. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle5. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Nokian Line SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Highly recommended3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good4. Nokian Line SUV Good5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended3. Nokian WetProof Recommended4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended5. Pirelli Cinturato P7 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: - | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Good + | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: Good - | 2.3 | 2.7 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,8 | 9,1 | 9,3 | 9,7 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 6,5 | 6,0 | 7,1 | 7,2 | |||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 9,0 | 9,0 | 6,5 | |||
| Pirelli Cinturato P7 Rating: Recommended | 8,3 | 8,6 | 8,3 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
