Segment
4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle5. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Exemplary2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary3. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended4. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended4. Nokian WetProof Recommended5. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Comfort | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: - | 3.7 | 3.7 | 4 | 3 | 3 | ||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Good + | 2.6 | 1.3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: - | 1.1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,8 | 9,1 | 9,3 | 9,7 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 6,5 | 6,0 | 7,1 | 7,2 | |||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 9,0 | 9,0 | 6,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
