Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Nokian WetProof
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2020 215/50 R18 test, where both the Proxes CF2 SUV and the WetProof were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Proxes CF2 SUV is made in Japan and WetProof is made in Finland.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AutoMotorSport
|
Summer
|
2019 | 215/55 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian WetProof
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian WetProof
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian WetProof
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian WetProof
Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Nokian WetProof
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
