Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle4. Nexen N blue HD Plus Lowcost
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Nexen N blue HD Plus vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Nokian Line SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Nokian Line SUV Good3. Nexen N blue HD Plus Satisfactory4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended3. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,8 | 9,1 | 9,3 | 9,7 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Conditionally recommended | 6,5 | 6,0 | 7,1 | 7,2 | |||
| Nexen N blue HD plus Rating: Conditionally recommended | 6,9 | 6,8 | 7,0 | 6,6 | |||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 8,3 | 7,8 | 9,3 | 6,9 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
