Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Premium2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza T001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Toyo (68%). But when it comes to comparing Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV and Bridgestone Turanza T001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Turanza T001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Proxes CF2 SUV and the Turanza T001 were tested. We also know where Proxes CF2 SUV is made - Japan.
| # | Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
| Bridgestone Turanza T001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Satisfactory2. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,1 | 7,8 | 9 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
