18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Toyo Observe S944 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Toyo Observe S944 /51%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%

Dimensions	R15 - R20	R14 - R19	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Toyo Observe S944 Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

3. Toyo Observe S944 53

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Toyo Observe S944 11x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

3. Toyo Observe S944 6.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

3. Toyo Observe S944 36.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Toyo Observe S944 14.82

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

3. Toyo Observe S944 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

3. Toyo Observe S944 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Toyo Observe S944 Satisfactory

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

85%

Toyo
Observe S944

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

72%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

2. Toyo Observe S944 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Toyo Observe S944 81%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Toyo Observe S944 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Toyo Observe S944 83%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

97%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Toyo
Observe S944

63%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

3. Toyo Observe S944 68%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 96%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

3. Toyo Observe S944 67%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 97%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

3. Toyo Observe S944 70%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Toyo Observe S944 62%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

92%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Toyo
Observe S944

63%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

3. Toyo Observe S944 57%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

3. Toyo Observe S944 67%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 99%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

3. Toyo Observe S944 60%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

3. Toyo Observe S944 65%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 58%

3. Toyo Observe S944 55%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Toyo Observe S944 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Toyo
Observe S944

77%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

76%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Toyo Observe S944 78%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 73%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

3. Toyo Observe S944 76%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

3. Toyo Observe S944 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Toyo
Observe S944

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

73%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Toyo Observe S944 73%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

3. Toyo Observe S944 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Toyo
Observe S944

86.9%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80.7%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Toyo Observe S944 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2-	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1-	2	2-	3+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Toyo Observe S944	35,7	30,8
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	31,4	30,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Toyo Observe S944	37,7	26,8
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1
Toyo Observe S944	38,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
Toyo Observe S944 Rating: Satisfactory	6,9	6,9	8,1	5,5	7	9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	7,8	6,6	7,4	10	5	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,7	9,6	8,6	8,2	8	7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Toyo Observe S944 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
Toyo Observe S944 Rating: Satisfactory	6,1	7,8	6,9	7	7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Very good	7,0	7,3	9,9	10	8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
Show test details

Comparison: Toyo Observe S944 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands