Comparison: Toyo Celsius vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook allround tyres are slightly better rated (82%) than Toyo (52%). The first tyre test of Toyo Celsius was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 215/60 R16 test, where both the Celsius and the Kinergy 4S2 H750 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Celsius is made in Japan and Kinergy 4S2 H750 is made in Korea.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
All season
|
2021 | 215/60 R16 | View |
Performance comparison
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Toyo Celsius
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
