In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Toyo (52%). The first tyre test of Toyo Celsius was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ARBÖ 2022 205/55 R17 test, where both the Celsius and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Celsius is made in Japan and Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 is made in Slovenia/France.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
All season
|
2021 | 215/60 R16 | View |
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Toyo Celsius
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.