Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Premium3. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac vs. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO vs. Continental AllSeasonContact
Quick summary: The Vredestein Quatrac is the clear test winner in independent comparisons — it scores 93% in our database and consistently places in the top third of Autobild and ADAC line-ups. The Toyo Celsius AS2 scores 54%, offering strong mileage and value but lagging behind in wet and dynamic handling. Neither model has been replaced by a newer model in our records.
Links: Vredestein Quatrac — manufacturer: Vredestein. Toyo Celsius AS2 — manufacturer: Toyo.
Aggregated test picture
- Autobild (multiple years): Vredestein finished as high as 2nd of 15 and frequently inside the top 5 (5th of 37 in another test). Toyo typically ranks lower (about 12th in comparable Autobild tests).
- ADAC: Vredestein placed 6th of 16, Toyo 11th of 16.
- Overall rating: Vredestein 93% vs Toyo 54% — a significant gap that matches the pattern seen across wet, dry and mixed-condition testing.
Vredestein Quatrac — strengths & weaknesses
- Strengths: Outstanding wet performance (wet handling, wet braking, aquaplaning resistance) and low exterior noise. Tests repeatedly highlight the tyre as a “Nässespezialist” with confident behaviour in rain and mixed conditions. Also scores well for dry handling and agility.
- Weaknesses: Average tread life in several tests and in some reports a slightly higher rolling resistance. Some test notes call out “average wet and snow braking” in specific scenarios, but overall the Quatrac’s wet reserves and handling usually compensate.
- Verdict: The Quatrac is the better-performing all-round tyre for drivers prioritising safety in wet conditions and dynamic handling. It is the superior choice in head-to-heads against the Toyo on braking and aquaplaning tests.
Toyo Celsius AS2 — strengths & weaknesses
- Strengths: Excellent value and long mileage — repeated test summaries praise its high kilometre performance and competitive price/value ratio. Comfortable ride and low exterior noise are other pluses. Good aquaplaning reserves are noted in several reviews, making it a dependable budget option.
- Weaknesses: Weaker winter and wet dynamic performance compared with the Quatrac: longer wet braking distances, understeer on wet and snowy surfaces, delayed steering response. These deficits show up in lower positions in Autobild and ADAC tests.
- Verdict: The Celsius AS2 is a sensible, cost-conscious choice for mileage-focused drivers who accept compromises in handling precision and wet braking. It is not the top performer in mixed-weather performance tests.
Head-to-head conclusion
Across the comprehensive set of tests (Autobild 2022–2025, ADAC and comparative reviews), the Vredestein Quatrac outperforms the Toyo Celsius AS2 in almost all dynamic and wet-condition metrics, and places consistently higher in overall rankings. The Toyo compensates with better wear and price/value, so choose the Quatrac if wet-weather safety and handling are priorities, or the Celsius AS2 if cost-per-kilometre and comfort dominate your buying decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary3. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory5. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended4. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended5. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Price/value
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
10
Mutual tests
| Name | Winter | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 1– | |||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 1– | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.4 | 51.0 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 43.9 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 38.6 | 47.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 3 | 3+ | 4 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 39.9 | 59.0 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.2 | 55.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 5.4 | 1.8 | 2.3 | ||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3.8 | 2.3 | 3.8 | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Good | 2.8 | 2.2 | 3.1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 40.9 | 50.6 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 40.3 | 45.4 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 40.8 | 50.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 | 43,5 | 53,2 | |||||
| Vredestein Quatrac | 41,7 | 47,1 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 44,9 | 63,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO | 41,4 | 44,4 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact | 45,8 | 48,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1 | |||
| Vredestein Quatrac Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Conditionally recommended | 2+ | 2 | 3 | 2- | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3+ | 1- | 3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
