18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Toyo Celsius AS2 /52%	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /79%	Laufenn G Fit 4S /64%	Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R20	R14 - R20	R13 - R17	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Toyo Celsius AS2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3 — comparison and verdict

This comparison summarizes independent test data and lab reviews for the Toyo Celsius AS2 and the Kleber Quadraxer 3. It aggregates Autobild and TyreReviews findings to give a clear picture of strengths, weaknesses and overall ranking so you can choose the best all‑round tyre for your needs.

Quick headline: the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is the stronger performer across mutual tests and scores much higher in our ratings (83% vs 54% for the Toyo). Neither model is listed as replaced by a newer model.

Aggregate test summary

Across Autobild test runs (different years and test sizes) the Kleber consistently finished toward the top: 4th/15 and 7th/37. The Toyo Celsius AS2 finished lower in the same comparisons at 12th/15 and 12th/37. Independent reviews (TyreReviews and test writeups) echo the same pattern: Kleber praised for winter grip and general balance; Toyo praised for mileage and value but penalised for wet/snow handling.

Strengths and weaknesses — what each tyre does best

Kleber Quadraxer 3 (made in PL) — key strengths: excellent snow traction and braking, strong aquaplaning resistance (longitudinal tests), short dry braking distances, and generally good comfort and exterior noise levels. Test notes mention it as an “all-rounder” with convincing behaviour on snow and ice. Main weakness: a tendency to understeer on wet/dry surfaces and slightly delayed steering response in some wet tests.

Toyo Celsius AS2 (made in JP) — key strengths: very good mileage and price/value, comfortable ride and low exterior noise in some tests, and solid aquaplaning reserves in certain test conditions. Main weaknesses: lower grip in wet and snowy conditions, understeer and delayed steering response on wet/slippery surfaces, higher rolling resistance in some reports, and generally weaker winter performance versus Kleber.

Mutual test positions and head-to-head

When compared directly in the same test pools the Kleber placed clearly ahead of the Toyo (4th vs 12th in a 15‑tyre test; 7th vs 12th in a 37‑tyre test). This consistent gap shows the Quadraxer 3 delivers better balanced performance across wet, dry and snow, while the Celsius AS2 focuses on longevity and economy at the expense of wet/snow grip.

Verdict — which should you choose?

Choose the Kleber Quadraxer 3 if you want a true all‑rounder with superior winter performance, short dry braking distances and confidence in aquaplaning tests. It’s the better pick for safety and balanced handling in mixed seasonal conditions.

Choose the Toyo Celsius AS2 if your priority is long mileage and low cost per kilometre, combined with decent comfort and aquaplaning reserves — but be aware of compromised wet and snow grip. The Celsius AS2 is a budget‑focused option rather than a top performer in mixed‑condition tests.

Further reading: tyre details and test pages — Toyo Celsius AS2 (manufacturer: Toyo) and Kleber Quadraxer 3 (manufacturer: Kleber).

Segment

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Premium

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 111

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 90

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 81

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 4

Number of tests

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 14x

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 13x

3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 11x

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 5x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 1.

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 7.

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 10.

Worst position in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 9.

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 15.

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 16.

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 21.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 5.91

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6.31

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 14.8

Year of the last test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2025

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 2025

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 2025

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 2022

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S Good

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

82%

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

79%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

74%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 81%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 70%

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S 69%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 60%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 96%

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 84%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 70%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 54%

Wet handling

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 88%

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 75%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 63%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 60%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 82%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 80%

3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 78%

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 77%

Wet circle cornering

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 92%

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 88%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 71%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO A

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S C

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

84%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

70%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

60%

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

44%

Snow traction

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 85%

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 75%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 55%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 51%

Snow handling

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 85%

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 57%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 53%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 32%

Snow braking

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 84%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 83%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 71%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 56%

Snow cornering

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 85%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 64%

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S 61%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 35%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

82%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

74%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

71%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

68%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 84%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 83%

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 70%

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 56%

Dry handling

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 88%

2. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 79%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 70%

4. Toyo Celsius AS2 64%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

79%

Toyo
Celsius AS2

76%

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

70%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

60%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 79%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 74%

3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 66%

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 51%

Comfort

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 80%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 76%

3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 73%

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S 69%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO ?

4. Laufenn G Fit 4S ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Toyo
Celsius AS2

82%

Laufenn
G Fit 4S

72%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

67%

Bridgestone
Weather Control A005 EVO

54%

Rolling resistance

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 80%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 67%

3. Laufenn G Fit 4S 59%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 0%

Price/value

1. Laufenn G Fit 4S 92%

2. Toyo Celsius AS2 91%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 67%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 54%

Mileage

1. Toyo Celsius AS2 84%

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S 67%

3. Kleber Quadraxer 3 62%

4. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO C

2. Laufenn G Fit 4S D

3. Toyo Celsius AS2 ?

4. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 10 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Winter	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	1–
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	1–
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good	2+	2	2-	2–
Laufenn G Fit 4S Rating: Good	2	2+	2-	2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2025 225/40 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	38.0	43.9
Toyo Celsius AS2	40.4	51.0
Kleber Quadraxer 3	39.3	47.9
Laufenn G Fit 4S	42.1	45.8
Show test details

AUTOBILD Allyear tyre test 2024 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3	3+	4
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good	2	2-	2+	3+
Show test details

AUTOBILD Allyear tyre test 2024 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	36.8	50.5
Toyo Celsius AS2	39.9	59.0
Kleber Quadraxer 3	38.5	58.4
Laufenn G Fit 4S	42.7	58.2
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2024 225/40 R18

Name
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Conditionally recommended
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good
Show test details

Tyre Reviews Allyear tyre test 2023 195/65 R15

Name
Toyo Celsius AS2
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Highly recommended
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	37.7	45
Toyo Celsius AS2	40.9	50.6
Kleber Quadraxer 3	38.3	48.5
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2023 225/45 R17

Name
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	39,9	44,4
Toyo Celsius AS2	43,5	53,2
Kleber Quadraxer 3	40,3	49,4
Laufenn G Fit 4S	45,2	53,9
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO	41,4	44,4
Show test details

Autobild Allyear tyre test 2022 195/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1-	1
Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2	1
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good	2	2+	2+	2-
Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Rating: Conditionally recommended	2+	2	3	2-
Show test details

Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO

Add to comparison

Toyo Celsius AS2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3 — comparison and verdict

Aggregate test summary

Strengths and weaknesses — what each tyre does best

Mutual test positions and head-to-head

Verdict — which should you choose?

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands