Segment
2. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Premium3. Vredestein Quatrac Premium4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Toyo Celsius AS2 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A vs. Vredestein Quatrac
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Toyo Celsius AS2 11.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac Exemplary3. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Very good4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Vredestein Quatrac Recommended4. Toyo Celsius AS2 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Toyo Celsius AS2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Hankook Kinergy 4S2 X H750A Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
