Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Torque TQ022 Lowcost
Comparison: Torque TQ022 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Torque) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Torque (5%). But when it comes to comparing Torque TQ022 and Kumho WinterCraft WP51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the TQ022 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Torque TQ022
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R20 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Torque TQ022 22.
Worst position in test
2. Torque TQ022 35.
Average position in tests
2. Torque TQ022 28.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Torque TQ022 | 40,9 | - | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Torque TQ022 | 42,9 | 28,9 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
