12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Torque TQ022 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Table of contents:

Summary
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Torque TQ022 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 /0%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Continental WinterContact TS 860 /0%

Dimensions	R20 - R20	R14 - R21	R16 - R19	R15 - R18	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Premium

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

4. Torque TQ022 Lowcost

5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 132

2. Continental WinterContact TS 860 76

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

5. Torque TQ022 1

Number of tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 23x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 15x

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

5. Torque TQ022 3x

Best position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 1.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 4.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

5. Torque TQ022 22.

Worst position in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 7.

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 18.

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

5. Torque TQ022 35.

Average position in tests

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2.35

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 7.87

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

5. Torque TQ022 28.67

Year of the last test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 2021

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 2018

5. Torque TQ022 2017

Best rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Very good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

5. Torque TQ022 ?

Worst rating in test

1. Continental WinterContact TS 860 Good

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Good

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

4. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

5. Torque TQ022 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Torque TQ022	39	-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	32,5	28,7
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Continental WinterContact TS 860	33,5	27,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Torque TQ022	40,9	-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	38,5	25,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Continental WinterContact TS 860	34,2	25,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Torque TQ022	42,9	28,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001	43,4	28,1
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Show test details

Comparison: Torque TQ022 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands