Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle3. Torque TQ022 Lowcost
Comparison: Torque TQ022 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
3. Torque TQ022 22.
Worst position in test
3. Torque TQ022 35.
Average position in tests
3. Torque TQ022 28.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Torque TQ022 | 39 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 32,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 34,7 | 28,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Torque TQ022 | 40,9 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 39,9 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Torque TQ022 | 42,9 | 28,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 42,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
