Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle2. Tigar High Performance Lowcost
Comparison: Tigar High Performance vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Serbia (Tigar) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Tigar is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Tigar (0%). The first tyre test of Tigar High Performance was done in 2024, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecsta HS52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the High Performance and the Ecsta HS52 were tested.
| # | Tigar High Performance
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R16 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Tigar High Performance | 38,3 | 34,5 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
