Segment
2. Syron Everest 1 plus Lowcost
Comparison: Syron Everest 1 plus vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Syron) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Syron (0%). But when it comes to comparing Syron Everest 1 plus and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Everest 1 plus and the Blizzak LM-001 EVO were tested.
| # | Syron Everest 1 plus
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R15 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Syron Everest 1 plus | 43,7 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO | 34,3 | 29,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
