Segment
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle3. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Superia Bluewin UHP vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.213. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 45.7 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 44,8 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36,1 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 37,7 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 32,8 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
