Segment
2. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Superia Bluewin UHP vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 45.7 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 44,8 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 37,7 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 34,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
