Segment
1. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Superia) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Superia (0%). The first tyre test of Superia Bluewin UHP was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Bluewin UHP and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Superia Bluewin UHP
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 45.7 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 44,8 | ||||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 37,7 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||