Segment
1. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost2. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Lowcost
Comparison: Superia Bluewin UHP vs. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Superia) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). Generally, Nexen winter tyres are slightly better rated (34%) than Superia (0%). The first tyre test of Superia Bluewin UHP was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Bluewin UHP and the Winguard Snow G3 WH21 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Superia Bluewin UHP
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 45.7 | - | |||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 | 37.7 | 32.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 44,8 | ||||||
| Nexen Winguard Snow G3 WH21 | 35,6 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
