Segment
1. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Superia) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Matador winter tyres are slightly better rated (40%) than Superia (0%). But when it comes to comparing Superia Bluewin UHP and Matador MP92 Sibir Snow, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Superia Bluewin UHP was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Bluewin UHP and the MP92 Sibir Snow were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Superia Bluewin UHP
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 44,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 37,7 | - | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 34,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 48,1 | - | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||