Segment
2. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost4. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost5. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Superia Bluewin UHP vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Sava Eskimo HP2 15.47
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory4. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory3. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 45.7 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 39.5 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 44,8 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 36,5 | 28 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 37,7 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 34,8 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
