Segment
1. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Superia) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Superia (0%). The first tyre test of Superia Bluewin UHP was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Barum Polaris 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Bluewin UHP and the Polaris 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Superia Bluewin UHP
| Barum Polaris 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Superia Bluewin UHP Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
1. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good
1. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 45.7 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 44,8 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Superia Bluewin UHP | 37,7 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||