Segment
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Sunny Wintermax NW 211 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Asia (prob. China) (Sunny) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Sunny (0%). But when it comes to comparing Sunny Wintermax NW 211 and Nokian WR A4, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Sportscars 2017 225/40 R18 test, where both the Wintermax NW 211 and the WR A4 were tested.
| # | Sunny Wintermax NW 211
| Nokian WR A4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Sunny Wintermax NW 211 Lowcost
1. Nokian WR A4 17.
1. Nokian WR A4 9.83
1. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
1. Nokian WR A4 63%
1. Nokian WR A4 64%
1. Nokian WR A4 71%
1. Nokian WR A4 65%
2. Nokian WR A4 78%
2. Nokian WR A4 72%
2. Nokian WR A4 73%
2. Nokian WR A4 79%
1. Nokian WR A4 72%
2. Nokian WR A4 83%
1. Nokian WR A4 81%
1. Nokian WR A4 78%
2. Nokian WR A4 89%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Sunny Wintermax NW 211 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 3+ | 2+ | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||