Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle2. Sunny NA305 Lowcost
Comparison: Sunny NA305 vs. Falken Azenis FK520
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Asia (prob. China) (Sunny) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Sunny (0%). The first tyre test of Sunny NA305 was done in 2020, compared to 2023 when was the Falken Azenis FK520 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the TYRE REVIEWS 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the NA305 and the Azenis FK520 were tested.
| # | Sunny NA305
| Falken Azenis FK520
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R55 - R55 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Sunny NA305 80%
Wet braking
2. Sunny NA305 58%
Wet handling
2. Sunny NA305 57%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Sunny NA305 58%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Sunny NA305 68%
Dry handling
2. Sunny NA305 57%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Sunny NA305 90%
Comfort
1. Sunny NA305 88%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Sunny NA305 100%
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunny NA305 | |||||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
