Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Starfire W200 Lowcost
Comparison: Starfire W200 vs. Michelin Alpin 5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Starfire) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Starfire (0%). But when it comes to comparing Starfire W200 and Michelin Alpin 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Starfire W200 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Alpin 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the W200 and the Alpin 5 were tested.
| # | Starfire W200
| Michelin Alpin 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Worst position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Starfire W200 | 42,6 | - | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
