Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Starfire W200 Lowcost
Comparison: Starfire W200 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Starfire) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Starfire (1%). The first tyre test of Starfire W200 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the W200 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested.
| # | Starfire W200
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R15 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Worst position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | ||||||
| Starfire W200 | 42,6 | ||||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||