Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Starfire W200 Lowcost
Comparison: Starfire W200 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Starfire (0%). But when it comes to comparing Starfire W200 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Starfire W200 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the W200 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested.
| # | Starfire W200
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Worst position in test
2. Starfire W200 36.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Starfire W200 | 42,6 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
