18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Semperit Speed-Life 2 vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Semperit Speed-Life 3 /51%	Semperit Speed-Life 2 /0%	Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 /0%	Firestone Roadhawk /57%	Continental EcoContact 6 /0%	Kleber Dynaxer HP3 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R21	R15 - R20	R15 - R20	R15 - R21	R13 - R24	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium

2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Lowcost

5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Lowcost

6. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Continental EcoContact 6 676

2. Firestone Roadhawk 161

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 128

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 124

5. Semperit Speed-Life 3 116

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 82

Number of tests

1. Firestone Roadhawk 21x

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 14x

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 7x

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 6x

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 6x

6. Continental EcoContact 6 5x

Best position in test

1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 2.

2. Firestone Roadhawk 2.

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 3.

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 4.

5. Continental EcoContact 6 7.

6. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 9.

Worst position in test

1. Continental EcoContact 6 23.

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 30.

3. Firestone Roadhawk 31.

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 39.

5. Semperit Speed-Life 3 43.

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 45.

Average position in tests

1. Firestone Roadhawk 11.9

2. Continental EcoContact 6 13

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 13.71

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 18.07

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 19

6. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 20.17

Year of the last test

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 2026

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 2026

3. Firestone Roadhawk 2023

4. Continental EcoContact 6 2022

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 2020

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 2020

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Exemplary

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory

5. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 Good

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory

3. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Satisfactory

5. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended

6. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient

Wet

(Overall rating)

Semperit
Speed-Life 3

81%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

70%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

69%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

63%

Continental
EcoContact 6

61%

Wet braking

1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 79%

2. Semperit Speed-Life 2 73%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 73%

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 73%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 67%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 66%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 85%

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 80%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 72%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 65%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 58%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 40%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 88%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 79%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 3 79%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 80%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 73%

6. Continental EcoContact 6 61%

Wet handling

1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 75%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 2 65%

4. Continental EcoContact 6 57%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 58%

6. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 33%

Wet circle cornering

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 84%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 76%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 73%

5. Continental EcoContact 6 69%

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 40%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Firestone Roadhawk A

2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 B

3. Semperit Speed-Life 3 B

4. Continental EcoContact 6 B

5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 C

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

85%

Continental
EcoContact 6

82%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

80%

Firestone
Roadhawk

70%

Semperit
Speed-Life 3

70%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

58%

Exterior noise

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 85%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 85%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 83%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 78%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 62%

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 57%

Interior noise

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 82%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 83%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 77%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 73%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 56%

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 0%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 ?

2. Continental EcoContact 6 ?

3. Firestone Roadhawk ?

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 ?

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

84%

Continental
EcoContact 6

78%

Firestone
Roadhawk

78%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

74%

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

70%

Semperit
Speed-Life 3

68%

Dry braking

1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 89%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 83%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 83%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 78%

5. Continental EcoContact 6 78%

6. Semperit Speed-Life 3 69%

Dry handling

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 94%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 88%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 85%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 2 73%

5. Continental EcoContact 6 70%

6. Semperit Speed-Life 3 61%

Dry driving behavior

1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 81%

2. Firestone Roadhawk 75%

3. Continental EcoContact 6 73%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 69%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 63%

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 60%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Semperit
Speed-Life 2

100%

Continental
EcoContact 6

90%

Semperit
Speed-Life 3

76%

Laufenn
S Fit EQ+ LK01

76%

Kleber
Dynaxer HP3

72%

Firestone
Roadhawk

69%

Mileage

1. Continental EcoContact 6 89%

2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 81%

3. Semperit Speed-Life 3 76%

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 72%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 64%

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 0%

Rolling resistance

1. Semperit Speed-Life 2 100%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 100%

3. Firestone Roadhawk 74%

4. Semperit Speed-Life 3 65%

5. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 61%

6. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

Fuel efficiency

1. Continental EcoContact 6 99%

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 82%

3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 80%

4. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 80%

5. Firestone Roadhawk 78%

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 0%

Price/value

1. Semperit Speed-Life 3 81%

2. Continental EcoContact 6 71%

3. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 65%

4. Firestone Roadhawk 61%

5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 0%

6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental EcoContact 6 A

2. Semperit Speed-Life 3 C

3. Firestone Roadhawk C

4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 C

5. Semperit Speed-Life 2 C

6. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Comparison: Semperit Speed-Life 3 vs. Semperit Speed-Life 2 vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands