Segment
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Premium2. Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Semperit Comfort-Life 2 vs. Michelin Energy Saver +
Table of contents:
| # | Semperit Comfort-Life 2
| Michelin Energy Saver +
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Comparing two popular summer tyres, we have the Semperit Comfort-Life 2 and the Michelin Energy Saver +. Both tyres present unique strengths and weaknesses in their performance, as highlighted through various tyre tests. Semperit and Michelin have long-standing reputations as reliable tyre manufacturers, and these models further reinforce their standing in the industry.
Looking at the results from the most recent Autobild test, the Michelin Energy Saver + secured a higher position, ranking 15th out of 51. This impressive performance is indicative of the tyre's superior qualities, particularly in a highly competitive context. The Semperit Comfort-Life 2, while not faring as well, had a respectable showing, placing 35th in the test.
Another insightful source of comparison is the ADAC tyre test. Out of 16 tyres reviewed, the Michelin Energy Saver + ranked 10th, while the Semperit Comfort-Life 2 secured the 14th position. This result further bolsters Michelin’s reputation for efficiency and reliability.
Though neither of these tyres boast upgrades to newer models at the moment, they both deliver impressive performance and enjoy favourable ratings in their respective categories. The Semperit Comfort-Life 2 offers a comfortable and quiet driving experience, excellent wet grip and an attractive price-performance ratio. However, it falls short in terms of wear, which may not appeal to those seeking longevity from their tyres.
On the other hand, the Michelin Energy Saver + stands out for its low rolling resistance, fuel-efficiency and overall durability. However, it lags slightly behind when it comes to wet performance, which is a crucial factor to consider for drivers frequently encountering rainy conditions.
In conclusion, while the Michelin Energy Saver + tends to outperform the Semperit Comfort-Life 2 in overall tests, both these tyres have their strengths. Your choice, therefore, should be determined by your specific driving requirements and conditions. Be sure to keep checking back for updates on Semperit and Michelin tyres as more data becomes available.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Exemplary2. Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Satisfactory2. Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Semperit Comfort-Life 2 | 40 | 39,8 | |||||
| Michelin Energy Saver + | 37,5 | 38,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 0,5 | 1,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 3,4 | 1,8 | ||
| Michelin Energy Saver + Rating: Good | 3,0 | 1,9 | 0,5 | 3,2 | 1,8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | ||
| Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 2,1 | 1,5 | 3,9 | 2,1 | ||
| Michelin Energy Saver + Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 3,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
