Segment
1. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Premium2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle3. Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Lowcost4. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Lowcost
Comparison: Semperit Comfort-Life 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 vs. Vredestein T-Trac 2 vs. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory3. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Satisfactory4. Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Satisfactory3. Vredestein T-Trac 2 Satisfactory4. Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Semperit Comfort-Life 2 | 40 | 39,8 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 | 39,2 | 37,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Semperit Comfort-Life 2 Rating: Good | 2,0 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 1,8 | 4,1 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Vredestein T-Trac 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,8 | 2,0 | 1,8 | ||
| Apollo Amazer 4G ECO Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 1,8 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
