Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Seiberling Touring 2 Lowcost4. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Seiberling Touring 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Seiberling Touring 2 | 38,7 | 38,2 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 36,5 | 29,6 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 35,7 | 31,6 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 39,0 | 33,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Seiberling Touring 2 | 37 | 37 | |||||
| Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
| Firestone Roadhawk | 34,3 | 30,8 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 37,7 | 36,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
