Segment
1. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Matador (33%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van also have C wet ratings.
# | Sava TRENTA M+S
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
Show test details |