Segment
1. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost2. Goodride SW612 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava TRENTA M+S vs. Goodride SW612
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Goodride (7%). But when it comes to comparing Sava TRENTA M+S and Goodride SW612, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the SW612 were tested.
| # | Sava TRENTA M+S
| Goodride SW612
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R12 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Goodride SW612 Rating: Not recommended | 3,1 | 3,6 | 4,9 | 2,3 | 3,4 | 3,0 | 1,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||
