Segment
1. Michelin Agilis+ Premium2. Sava Trenta 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Trenta 2 vs. Michelin Agilis+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Sava (62%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Trenta 2 and Michelin Agilis+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Trenta 2 and the Agilis+ were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Sava Trenta 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Michelin Agilis+ also have B wet ratings.
| # | Sava Trenta 2
| Michelin Agilis+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Sava Trenta 2 13.
Worst position in test
2. Sava Trenta 2 13.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Sava Trenta 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Michelin Agilis+ Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,9 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
