Segment
1. Sava Trenta 2 Lowcost2. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Trenta 2 vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Fulda summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Sava (66%). But when it comes to comparing Sava Trenta 2 and Fulda Conveo Tour 2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Trenta 2 and the Conveo Tour 2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 50% of Sava Trenta 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 50% of Fulda Conveo Tour 2 has C rating.
| # | Sava Trenta 2
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Sava Trenta 2 13.
Worst position in test
2. Sava Trenta 2 13.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Sava Trenta 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
