Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle3. Sava Intensa UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Nokian zLine
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
