Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle5. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Upper-middle6. Sava Intensa UHP Lowcost7. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Nokian zLine vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Uniroyal RainSport 3 vs. Semperit Speed-Life 2
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Pirelli P ZERO 6.064. Nokian zLine 7.387. Semperit Speed-Life 2 13.71
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory5. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Satisfactory7. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Pirelli P ZERO Good3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Uniroyal RainSport 3 Satisfactory5. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory6. Semperit Speed-Life 2 Satisfactory7. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Uniroyal Rainsport 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,8 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Semperit Speed-Life 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 2,5 | 1,8 | 3,4 | 1,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
