Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle5. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Upper-middle6. Sava Intensa UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Nokian zLine vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 vs. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
4. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Pirelli P ZERO 6.064. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory5. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Satisfactory6. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Pirelli P ZERO Good3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory5. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory6. Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Toyo Proxes T1 Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 1,6 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
