Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle4. Sava Intensa UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti vs. Nokian zLine
Table of contents:
| # | Sava Intensa UHP
| Pirelli P ZERO
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R22 | R17 - R24 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
2. Pirelli P ZERO 6.064. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Pirelli P ZERO Good3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Good | 2,5 | 1,3 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,5 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
