Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium3. Nokian zLine Upper-middle4. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Upper-middle5. Sava Intensa UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 vs. Nokian zLine vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V105
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
3. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
3. Pirelli P ZERO 6.064. Nokian zLine 7.38
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended3. Nokian zLine Recommended4. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory5. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian zLine Recommended3. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended4. Sava Intensa UHP Satisfactory5. Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| Sava Intensa UHP Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Pirelli P ZERO Rating: Good | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 2,1 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 1,9 | ||
| Nokian zLine Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | ||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,2 | 1,5 | 3,5 | 2,7 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
