Segment
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Lowcost2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Linglong Sport Master
Table of contents:
| # | Sava Intensa UHP 2
| Linglong Sport Master
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Sava Intensa UHP 2 and Linglong Sport Master are two summer tyres that have been tested to provide satisfying performances. Both have their strengths and drawbacks, and this comparison will delve into their unique attributes, helping you make an informed decision.
The Sava Intensa UHP 2, a successor to the Sava Intensa UHP, boasts several pros, such as short dry braking distances and low rolling resistance. Furthermore, it's famed for its value-for-money, justifying its 67% rating. However, it struggles with understeer in wet and dry conditions and has a moderate resistance to aquaplaning.
On the other hand, Linglong Sport Master, with a 72% rating, outperforms Sava Intensa UHP 2 in terms of exterior noise reduction. It proves its mettle with short braking distances whether in wet or dry conditions. Nevertheless, its downsides are quite significant, including very low mileage, strong understeer in dry handling, and moderate comfort.
In Autobild's 50 tyre test, Linglong Sport Master took the 7th position, beating Sava Intensa UHP 2, which crawls behind at the 11th spot. Despite this lead, Linglong Sport Master's performance is marred by high exterior noise levels.
In terms of the mutual tests conducted by Autobild, Linglong Sport Master demonstrates short dry and wet braking distances, offering a quiet ride at a budget-friendly price. But, it seriously lacks in mileage, showing understeer in dry handling and providing only a moderate level of comfort.
Simultaneously, Sava Intensa UHP 2, while featuring short dry braking distances, low rolling resistance and an affordable price level, can disappoint in handling, particularly evident in understeering in both wet and dry conditions and a moderate aquaplaning resistance.
In summary, while both tyres have their unique strengths and weaknesses, the Linglong Sport Master appears to have a slight upper hand in overall performance in comparison to the Sava Intensa UHP 2. However, Sava cannot be undermined as it provides great value for the price and fares relatively well in dry conditions.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 12.86
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory2. Sava Intensa UHP 2 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 35.9 | 34.4 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Sava Intensa UHP 2 | 61.7 | 27.4 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
